evaluation
Evidence type: Evaluation i
Information about the programme design and rationale
Evidence about Financial Capability outcomes for programme participants
Evidence that the Financial Capability outcomes were caused by the programme
Evidence about programme implementation, feasibility, and piloting
Evidence about relative costs and benefits of the programme
This was a teacher training programme delivered by ASIC to 8,003 teachers across 58 primary and 34 secondary schools in Australia.
It was designed to build:
The professional learning was supported by curriculum resources designed to engage students to apply their learning in real life contexts across mathematics, science and English. The resources included digital resources for teachers such as interactive whiteboard activities and online educational games.
One independent evaluation of the programme (conducted by the Australian Council for Educational Research) has been published. This study involved qualitative interviews with project officers and a quantitative survey of teachers in 92 trial MoneySmart schools.
The evaluation does not measure the impact of the programme on the students themselves (or involve a control group) but instead explores teachers’ perceptions of the programme’s impact.
The evaluation (which involved qualitative interviews with project officers and quantitative surveys of teachers participating in the trial MoneySmart schools) described positive impacts amongst teachers, including:
The report also made recommendations for the evaluation of future initiatives to ensure that objectives are met, suggesting that an evaluator should be engaged from the start of the process to:
Dr Robert Simons Principal Research Fellow
Australian Council for Educational Research
t: 02 8338 6840 e: robert.simons@acer.edu.au